Legal cases involving journalistic practice – like libel, defamation and protection of sources – can often be like nasty divorces. They drag on and on, and legal costs soar. |
Whichever side you’re on, a qualified expert witness can help break the logjam in your favour.
Canadian courts have recently shown a willingness to expand the defences available to journalists accused of libel. “Acting responsibly” has been added to the traditional defences of truth, fair comment and privilege.
Courts will need to hear independent evidence about whether or not media organizations acted according to the standards of responsible journalism.
- My expert opinion statements have an impressive record of helping my clients.
- My qualifications as a journalism expert have been accepted by courts in Ontario and British Columbia.
- I have taught journalism for 21 years at Ryerson University.
- I helped review and rewrite the Canadian newspaper industry’s Statement of Principles.
- My book Yesterday’s News took a critical look at journalistic practice. It was on the Globe and Mail’s list of the 100 most notable books of 1998.
Statement of personal ethics
As an expert witness, I represent both media organizations and plaintiffs against the media because my interest is solely to promote responsible, accurate journalism. I take on cases that I think clarify issues that further that goal. Full disclosure means that clients are told in advance if I have previously represented the other side to any given dispute.